Post by account_disabled on Jan 23, 2024 3:40:38 GMT -6
violates free enterprise, free competition and freedom of work. Based on this understanding, judge Carlos Santos de Oliveira, from the 22nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro, prohibited, this Monday (10/9), the Department of Road Transport of the State of Rio de Janeiro ( Detro-RJ) prevents the activities of the Cabify transportation app, under penalty of a daily fine of R$50,000. Disclosure/Uber For the TJ-RJ judge, the restriction violates constitutional principles.
reproduction The company's Buy Phone Number List defense, led by Lima Feigelson Advogados, filed an appeal against the decision that denied the request for an injunction in a writ of mandamus to suspend the effects of Municipal Decree 40,518/2015 and Municipal Law 6,106/2016, both in the city of Rio. The regulations prohibited the paid transport of ptauntaunengers in private cars. However, according to Carlos Santos de Oliveira, rapporteur of the process, the rules contradict the constitutional principles of free enterprise and competition and freedom of work.
Furthermore, the judge pointed out that the laws unduly restrict the consumer's freedom of choice in the provision of transport services, “establishing a true monopoly” in this sector, which can always be exercised by private individuals. Thus, it granted suspensive effect to the appeal until the merits of the writ of mandamus were decided. Kizzy Mota , specialist in new technology litigation at Lima Feigelson Advogados, celebrates the decision. "Any impediments to our client's activities in Rio de Janeiro are no longer supported by any legal basis and, on the contrary, must be punished with a fine until the merits of the writ of mandamus are decided", points out the lawyer.
reproduction The company's Buy Phone Number List defense, led by Lima Feigelson Advogados, filed an appeal against the decision that denied the request for an injunction in a writ of mandamus to suspend the effects of Municipal Decree 40,518/2015 and Municipal Law 6,106/2016, both in the city of Rio. The regulations prohibited the paid transport of ptauntaunengers in private cars. However, according to Carlos Santos de Oliveira, rapporteur of the process, the rules contradict the constitutional principles of free enterprise and competition and freedom of work.
Furthermore, the judge pointed out that the laws unduly restrict the consumer's freedom of choice in the provision of transport services, “establishing a true monopoly” in this sector, which can always be exercised by private individuals. Thus, it granted suspensive effect to the appeal until the merits of the writ of mandamus were decided. Kizzy Mota , specialist in new technology litigation at Lima Feigelson Advogados, celebrates the decision. "Any impediments to our client's activities in Rio de Janeiro are no longer supported by any legal basis and, on the contrary, must be punished with a fine until the merits of the writ of mandamus are decided", points out the lawyer.